The Arts

April 26, 2008

Brando, Native American Activist, Gave Money to Irgun Out of Gratitude to Jews Who Helped Him in the Arts

More on artists and Israel. Here is a story my mom sent me, written by a Louie Kemp, a Minnesotan, speaking of his friendship with the late Marlon Brando. Kemp says that in '46 Brando gave tons of money to the Irgun , in part out of gratitude to Jews like acting theorist Stella Adler. "Marlon... told me with great emotion that his success in theater and movies was largely due to the Jewish people in New York who befriended and taught him." Huh.

The late Brando is famous for his activism on behalf of Native Americans. Had a Native American accept his Oscar, etc. I bet he'd be on the Nakba if he were around today...

Nadine Gordimer Under Pressure to Boycott Israeli Writers' Festival

Nadine Gordimer--South African, Jewish, Nobelist--is under pressure to boycott a writers' conference in Israel that she had signed up to appear at next month. (Thus spake Haaretz, no it's not in the American press.) Looks like she'll boycott.

On Thursday, Ambassador Gillerman bragged about all the artists and writers Israel sends out into the world. He spoke of a book fair that Israel had lately sponsored, in Europe as I remember. Israel was also a sponsor of the Telluride Film Festival, which I attended last summer. This is an important part of Israel's outreach. Sponsoring the arts gives Israel a good name in elite circles, deflecting pressure from the very community you would expect to lead opposition to apartheid conditions in the West Bank.

Two British Jews urging Gordimer to stay home talk about the Nakba. Good for them, Nakba consciousness on the rise. They write, "The whole of Palestinian civil society has called for a cultural boycott of Israel." Gordimer opposed apartheid in South Africa. Sure hope she doesn't go.

April 15, 2008

The 'Nakba' Memorial Should Be Close by the 'Holocaust Memorial'

Now that I'm looking into the "Nakba," or Palestinian catastrophe of '48, I've come to understand that division of water rights, land swaps, settlement of refugee issues etc. are all subsidiary to a spiritual process of recognition. Last night I went to a panel at Columbia University that furthered this belief. Two women activists, one Israeli, the other Palestinian, spoke of their work on the situation.

Esti Tsal was the Israeli. She is a small woman with a strong narrow face and short hair and hip glasses, about 45. She described herself as an artist. She lives in Tel Aviv and does abstract art, minimalist art. She was somewhat disorganized, throwing her bags down as she came in late, and was utterly familiar to me: a privileged Jewish artist, a little self-absorbed, with quiet, listening eyes.

Five years ago a friend associated with Machsom Watch urged her to come to the West Bank, to the place Israelis could go: Zone A, to see the checkpoints. "'You don't believe what is going on there," the friend said. "I couldn't even imagine what she's talking about." Tsal said, OK, the next time you go, I will go.

Then Tsal couldn't stay away. "What you see usually is soldiers--young--and citizens. Soldiers and citizens." She felt as if her entire vision of the world had corrected itself, become clear, and then she felt called to document what she was seeing. Because Israelis go on with their lives with no recognition of what is happening 25 minutes away from them, and the media are weary of talking about it. "Leave us alone," they say. "It doesn't sell. Nobody wants to hear about it."

Documentary was the last thing anyone would ever say about Tsal's art. But she began taking photographs. "I was really obsessed by documentary. I went four or five times a week." Tsal was very clear about what she was doing: documenting crimes. "The main reason our soldiers are there, the settlements. Why are they there? To defend Israelis, to defend the Jewish people, whoever they are."

Her photographs of interactions between soldiers and citizens at checkpoints were on easels, around the room in Lerner Hall. I wish they were online. I will describe them a little later.

The Palestinian woman was a lot younger than Tsal, and beautiful--a lawyer, named Lubna Hammad. Born in Jordan, as a girl she had visited her family's land in the West Bank every year so as to keep her papers up to date--and observed an ongoing process of what she called "ethnic cleansing" by Jewish colonists. By the time she got to college she vowed to undo the injustice with all her power. This led her to Columbia Law School. "I was so full of more than vengeance." Hammad aimed to sue every soldier, every politician. She studied international law, human rights law, war crimes law.

Then she took a course in something called Transitional Justice that brought her to study the Truth and Reconciliation process in South Africa. Hammad developed a new idea of justice that involved recognition, accountability. She told a story to explain it. In South Africa, a military officer testified in great detail about how he had arrested, tortured and then killed a young activist. The victim's mother sat watching in the courtroom. When the testimony was complete, the mother was asked what she wanted. "I want the red shirt he was wearing when he was killed." Hammad interpreted: "For her that was absolute justice. Another mother said, 'I want him to be prosecuted.'"

With this new understanding of justice, Hammad began pressing for acknowledgment and recognition of the Nakba of '47-48. "This is the root cause." She doesn't care whether there is one state, two states, or a million states, so long as this recognition of the ethnic cleansing  in '48 occurs. This knowledge exists chiefly in Israel, she said: in the archives, and in the memories of the perpetrators.

Palestinians had little idea what was happening, she said. When a recent tour of activists on the right of return came to Brooklyn (the night after I saw it in Manhattan), Palestinian-Americans were stunned to hear Eitan Bronstein, an Israeli, describe the nascent movement inside Israel to come to terms with their history. She said that these efforts were encouraging Arab survivors of the Deir Yassin massacre in '48 to come forward with reports that "many" women were raped there. "It wasn't hard for them to say that women and children were killed." But the utmost symbol of humiliation, rape, had been hard to discuss. "Until today, you wouldn't find a single Palestinian to talk about this."

Tsal interjected that she had first heard the word Nakba a few years ago. "Now everyone's talking about Nakba, even our minister of education." Not in the U.S., Esti. I tried to get a magazine assignment to write about it. No dice.

Questions began, then an argument, led by a loud marketing executive seated in the front row, over how best to get images of the Occupation out to the world. There were 30 in the room. I raised my hand but wasn't called on. Then I had to go. My question was for Esti Tsal.

Her photographs are searing. They are pieces of minimalist art, alas I can't find them online (though here are a couple). In one, a soldier's disembodied arm sticks out of the narrow window of a concrete pillbox, gesturing for what he wants from a Palestinian. The caption said, "the ordering, pointing finger." In another a perfectly groomed old man held out his pita bread to the same window, to be inspected. Another man stood turning his empty plastic bag upside down. Two Palestinian youths carried an old man who could not walk through the concrete barriers of the checkpoint, to get him to a car.

The machinery of the checkpoint was all modern. Gleaming steel, turnstiles, sleek lines. The worst photo showed an Israeli soldier, looking like a cheder-student with his beard and wirerimmed glasses, holding a semiautomatic rifle and standing over a Palestinian taxi driver he had knocked to the ground as a group of dazed Palestinian young men stood around, unable to respond.

The photos were about power, humiliation, abasement, emasculation. They reminded me of the book my mother bought six new copies of when I was a teenager as an act of racial memory, so as to give one to each of her six children (and my mother never bought new books, ever): Roman Vishniac's photos of the Warsaw ghetto. Tsal seemed to be echoing the imagery many of us have of Jews oppressed in central and eastern Europe. I wanted to ask Tsal if these references were intentional.

March 28, 2008

Nakba Commemoration Builds; Barenboim to Shun Israel's 60th Birthday Party

When I began collecting string on Jews calling for Nakba commemoration, I thought it was statistically aberrant behavior. Wrong. There is a real groundswell upon us. Ynet reports that Israeli conductor Daniel Barenboim will shun festivities surrounding Israel's 60th birthday because it commemorates a period of terrible suffering for the Palestinian people. Add this to the No Time to Celebrate petition among Jews, Hannah Mermelstein writing "It was their land first" in the Jewish Advocate, Australian Jews signing on to a giant Nakba ad--well, it's a real trend. And it's only going to get bigger.

Again I say, this shows the power of ideas. The Palestinian people have known about the Nakba for 60 years. It took intellectuals, the New Historians, to bring these ideas to the west...

March 11, 2008

Shocker: 'New York Public Library' to Become 'Schwarzman Public Library'

My favorite building in New York, the New York Public Library, where I received much of my literary, journalistic, and political education, is being renamed after a buyout baron: the Stephen A. Schwarzman building. For a paltry $100 million gift. This is a scandal. Readers and lovers of learning must rise up against this now!

The New York Times coverage of the news is also shocking in its oily obeisance to Schwarzman. The Times suggests that it is common to rename cultural institutions after rich people. No--that's football stadiums and basketball arenas. It hints there could be controversy over the library board's decision without the reporter lifting a finger to find out about the readers' reaction. Without going into Room 315 and talking to people like me who depend on this temple's resources, how they feel about his name being "incised" on the outside.

Schwarzman made his money by retooling the American economy in the last 10 years, buying up Wisconsin hospitals and the like and making them more efficient, putting people out of jobs. Yes, call me a populist. I am. The NYPL is a populist/elite institution, free and open to lovers of learning, but warning with its every gesture and intonation that the stupid should stay away.

I'm shocked and upset. And again I say, My people are principals in American society. We are equal members of the establishment.

March 10, 2008

Sympathy for Spitzer

I'm a 52-year-old man with sexual issues, and all I feel for Eliot Spitzer tonight is sympathy.

I wonder how many other guys my age can identify with his lusts, and how many of the male journalists reporting on his troubles have similar feelings that they are guiltily suppressing, or have struggled with, even as they wring every detail they can out of his misery. That is the worst hypocrisy here, a lot worse than Spitzer's for having once prosecuted prostitution: the widely-upheld pretense that bourgeois American marriage resolves sexual life for all men.

No, I don't think most women get this. The conversations I had with women today were fake and vaguely insulting, while the conversations I had with men were real. One guy wondered if Spitzer was getting laid. Another said another New York governor, Roosevelt, had sex outside his marriage and maybe this will finally allow the country to have a genuine conversation about male sexuality. When I say insulting, I mean the derision there is for male sexuality in the culture: the condescending or mocking columns we are about to be flooded with, about bad judgment and male sexuality. I'm not going to the barricades, but I do hope this case opens up awareness. Gays had their liberation, women had theirs, what about straight married guys?

The only guy I could respect on television tonight was Alan Dershowitz. Execrable on Palestinian human rights, he was eloquent on Spitzer's. In the end this was about a man and a woman having a consensual relationship, he said. Our society is primitive about these matters compared to the Europeans. Good for you, Dersh. A friend of mine pointed out that our society is now so uncorrupted, i.e. innocent, Spitzer couldn't turn to procurers. JFK had procurers, so did Clinton as Arkansas governor--the state police, who felt used by him. (Maybe that's when the culture was turning.)

But Spitzer had to go to the ATM by himself, apparently, and do the emails by himself. In Europe his needs would have a place. Not a place of honor, but a place. In the U.S. we make marriage a sexual stronghold in the midst of a hypersexualized culture, then stoke the men with Viagra like hormone-fed cattle, stroke them with internet porn, politicize married sex as a kind of covenant of citizenship. When sex is actually a dirty thing. "Love has pitched his tent/in the place of excrement," Yeats said. Or read Disgrace, the modern classic by Coetzee. I'm not complaining about marriage, it's the best thing in my life. I'm saying that sex and marriage are not congruent entities. There's privacy in a marriage, or ought to be. Read Rilke:

questions of love, even more than everything else that is important, cannot be resolved publicly and according to this or that agreement; ...they are questions, intimate questions from one human being to another, which in any case require a new, special, wholly personal answer

I feel like Spitzer's case may open up the discussion and pull us forward. It couldn't happen with Clinton because the guy was such a pig and the cases were so messy. The Supreme Court was justly involved, 9-0, I remind you, on a question of a woman's civil liberties, and Clinton gamed the law at every turn, and the women were threatened. This time it's clean. So let people snicker. I feel that other men will join Dershowitz and me, and there will be a little progress...

February 25, 2008

The Internationalist Academy Awards

The country is sick of unilateralism, unipolarism (to use the neocons' arrogant word). The Oscars this year were a bath of internationalism. Javier Bardem won Best Actor and spoke in exalted Spanish, a nonverbal French chick won Best Actress, surprising everyone. A French producer said he couldn't speak English so he spoke French, and Tilda Swinton spoke a cultivated arch English that was unintelligible to this American ear. The best picture of the year (deservedly) was an interpretation by two Jewish guys of a western fable imagined by a Catholic novelist. The best foreign film was a morally-complex Holocaust story told by an Austrian who states openly and with shame that his parents (or grandparents--sorry, heard him on the radio) were Nazis.

Of course Hollywood was given to America by outsider business Jews, but praise the lord we are moving past the Spielbergian Katzenbergian extravaganza era to one of dark sophisticated European-influenced art. The trend is good for Obama, and good for the Palestinians too.

February 03, 2008

'There Will Be Blood' Murders the Spirit. 'Into the Wild' Exalts It

I saw "There Will Be Blood" last night and found it exciting and disappointing. The most important thing about the film for me was the noble treatment of work in America. When do you see a film that so honors physical labor as this one does, that so revels in showing us the male body toiling against nature? I found this incredibly moving and evocative of important values, physical ones, that the meritocracy is destroying...

As for the central ideas and message of the movie, I found them rather simplistic and less nuanced than even Upton Sinclair's original ideas. Daniel Plainview, the oil mogul played by Daniel Day-Lewis, is a monster. You realize he's a monster a half hour in, then the suspense is over, for another 2 hours. I know it is a great performance, I got bored. The monstrousness is unrelieved by any larger understanding or humor; and religion is trashed in the film. I believe that Sinclair had religious beliefs. The film murders them.

I would compare this with a genuinely-religious movie, "Into the Wild", which has gotten scarcely as much notice lately as TWBB.

"Into the Wild" is in essence the Robinson Crusoe story, about an alienated individual who becomes a castaway. The same issues that arose in the original case, of Defoe's glamorization of Alexander Selkirk in the 1700s, arose in Sean Penn's treatment of Chris McCandless of the wonderful Jon Krakauer book. McCandless was a mental case, and so was Selkirk. Selkirk was, I imagine, a schizophrenic. That is surely the reason he was tossed off that boat in the first place. When he came home, he apparently built a hut in his parents' back yard. Defoe of course made him heroic; and so does Sean Penn. That is the problem with the movie; there is no sense that this is one screwed-up cat.

Having said that, though, I must emphasize that the movie has a ravishing religious core to it. Notwithstanding this kid's troubles, one person after another reaches out to try and save him. A hippie girl tries to make love to him (the creep doesn't respond). Old hippies try to adopt him and bring him into the human family. The Hal Holbrooke character also tries to adopt him and stop him hurling himself into Alaska. The Vince Vaughan character tries to bring him back to engagement with rude boisterous crazy life. All these characters are damaged people, and all reach out to try and help someone that most of us would walk away from. I myself feel contempt for McCandless; the movie shows people loving him. This religious theme is completely under control (unlike the psychological stuff) and uplifting and maybe even revealing about the human spirit.  Compare that to "There Will Be Blood," which is a cynical downer and which is getting all this praise, and I wonder what dark materialist mood is convulsing the culture.

 

January 18, 2008

British-Jewish Disillusionment in Israel Comes to Off-Broadway

My friend Garrett Eisler informs me that film director Mike Leigh's new play, Two Thousand Years, which has sold out in London, has come to off-Broadway, and is all about stuff I talk about on this blog: Jewish identity around issues of assimilation and Israel...  From Eisler's review in Time Out:

Like Leigh himself, the middle-aged parents hail from a Socialist Zionist background and retain their utopian leftist passion, but have grown disillusioned with Israel. Their cosmopolitan daughter (Natasha Lyonne) makes her parents proud as an international human-rights activist, but their son horrifies them when he turns to Orthodox Judaism for answers. The work crackles with Leigh’s signature humor (a characteristically Jewish sense of tragicomedy, he feels), but underneath it seems to lie, in the laudatory words of Guardian critic Michael Billington, an exploration of “the loss of faith” in “a world in which people have increasingly lost their beliefs in politics, religion and social progress.”

Further evidence that European attitudes towards Israel are invading our shores. Hallelujah!

January 08, 2008

Mike Huckabee Is 'A Face in the Crowd'

In 1957 Elia Kazan made a movie called "A Face in the Crowd," about the emerging power of television & celebrity, in which an Arkansas hobo and guitar picker who has tremendous likeability is discovered in a jail cell--and played by Andy Griffith--gains acclaim and then political power. The alternative title of the film was  "Arkansas Traveler," and yes, it had a dark side to it.

Isn't this Mike Huckabee? Isn't that what you think of when you look at him: he's a face in the crowd. Then you hear him speak and you fall under his spell. He's a brilliant speaker, he feels like your real friend. I do like him, though I don't really trust him. In the end, I think he has nothing really to say. (And here he is on my favorite subject--unreconstructed).

(This is not my idea. It comes from writer Lynn Hirschberg, whose brain a lot of writers and editors pick for insights).