2-State Solution 'a Complete Disaster,' Israeli-American Author Says
Here's Naomi Ragen, a writer who seems to split her citizenship between Israel and the U.S., speaking to the Sydney Morning Herald. She's orthodox, and dismissive of most Jews:
Understand: No such thing as Palestinians. Like Golda Meir. And where were your ancestors, Naomi? And of Antony Loewenstein, the anti-Zionist, she says: "Bring it on. Those kind of people are easy. They say one lie after another. He's a typical self-hating, ignorant Jew."
Oh my. I wish the American press were doing these stories every day: the Jews who oppose the two-state solution. How many there are, what they're thinking. No, it's easier to attack Walt and Mearsheimer.
If you are a non-jew and you disagree, you are anti-semitic. If you are a jew and you disagree, you are are a self-hating jew. So, with either put-down you win the arguement? Amazing strategy!
Posted by: bill | August 09, 2008 at 03:29 PM
That's how another Bill likes it--Bill Pearlman, aka SOG. Witty's
another version, just more abstract. They both live off the goys within the borders of the USA. That's kosher.
Posted by: charles Keating | August 09, 2008 at 04:20 PM
Thanks Phil,
Sadly, the vast majority of mainstream Diaspora groups talk publicly about a two-state solution but constantly scuttle any chance of it succeeding.
Besides, how will it take for the world to recognise that Israel has killed the chances of two-states with its obsession with the colonial enterprise.
The result? The end of the Jewish state, in time.
Posted by: Antony Loewenstein | August 09, 2008 at 09:16 PM
Yep. Eventually we will get a POTUS again, like Ike; when the critical mass of American people wake up--meanwhile, I suggest we support Israeli attack on Iran (greenlight thru the backdoor) & its aftermath as a catalyst for the cup of strong joe needed.
Most Americans got to feel they have a stake in the thing--nothing like really high gas price and, hopefully, more dead American low class soldiers in the Middle East....
Posted by: charles Keating | August 09, 2008 at 09:38 PM
Wait.
Babylonian destruction?
You mean the Babylonians were responsible for...but...
Gee, good thing there's no Babylonians around these days.
Or those Israelites might be tempted to wreak havoc on 'em, huh?
For retribution and revenge, and like that.
Posted by: Roy Belmont | August 10, 2008 at 05:20 PM